Who Owns Everything
and How It Works
Three companies secretly own all the major corporations in the world at the same time. The same people run both Wall Street and the government. The IMF keeps poor countries in debt by design. All of it explained, with real names and real numbers.
Part 1 — The Big Three Own Everything
An index fund is a product that lets ordinary people invest in "the stock market" without picking individual stocks. Instead of buying shares in one company, you buy a tiny slice of hundreds of companies at once. For example: "I want to own a piece of every company in the S&P 500." Index funds are sold by investment management firms — and the three largest are BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street. They collectively manage roughly $26 trillion in assets.
Here is the problem: when you buy into an S&P 500 index fund, the fund management firm (BlackRock, Vanguard, or State Street) holds the actual shares on your behalf. This means these three firms hold voting rights over those shares at corporate shareholder meetings. Because they hold so much of every major company's stock, they become the single largest shareholder in almost every Fortune 500 company simultaneously.
The result: BlackRock is the largest shareholder in Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Meta, Exxon, JPMorgan, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, and Spotify — all at the same time. Vanguard is the second largest shareholder in most of those same companies. State Street is third. Three firms control the governance of the entire economy.
Aladdin is BlackRock's proprietary risk management AI. It processes the portfolios of roughly 200 financial institutions — including pension funds, insurance companies, and rival investment managers — giving BlackRock real-time visibility into what every major player in the global economy is holding, at risk from, and planning to do.
In practice, this means BlackRock knows more about global financial positions than any government, central bank, or competitor. When markets get stressed — a war, a pandemic, a rate shock — BlackRock has risk intelligence that no one else has access to. In 2020, the US Federal Reserve hired BlackRock to manage its emergency bond-buying programs. The company that holds the most shares in the banks that needed rescuing was hired to manage the rescue. The conflict of interest was explicit and documented; no one with authority to stop it did.
- Move your savings from any fund managed by BlackRock, Vanguard, or State Street to a credit union's investment account or a cooperative investment fund. Search "ethical index fund alternatives" or "cooperative investment credit union" in your country.
- If you have a 401k or pension, ask your HR department which fund managers your retirement money uses. Request the "sustainable" or "ESG screened" options — many exclude weapons contractors and fossil fuels.
- Vote your proxy — if you own any individual stock directly, you receive a proxy ballot each year. Vote against BlackRock-affiliated board nominees at any company where you can. BlackRock files thousands of votes as a bloc; your opposing vote matters in close contests.
- Contact your elected representative and demand SEC reform: "Index funds above $500 billion in assets should not be permitted to hold controlling stakes in competing companies in the same sector." This is currently legal and unregulated.
- Demand public disclosure of Aladdin's client list. Which governments, pension funds, and sovereign wealth funds have given BlackRock visibility into their financial positions? This is currently proprietary and secret.
Part 2 — The Revolving Door
The "revolving door" refers to the practice of senior government officials and regulators taking jobs at the companies they previously regulated — and vice versa. The result is that the people who write and enforce financial laws are either former Wall Street executives, or people who know they will be hired by Wall Street after their government service. This means the regulations are written to benefit the industry, not the public. It is not corruption in the bribery sense — it is entirely legal. That is what makes it so effective.
Under US law, former government officials must wait between 1 and 2 years before lobbying their former agency. This is called a "cooling-off period." In practice, most senior officials are hired as consultants, board members, or advisors — roles that pay millions without requiring registered lobbying. The law's gaps are features, not bugs.
- H.R. 3554 — Close the Revolving Door Act of 2025: A bill introduced by Rep. Joe Neguse and co-led by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez that would impose a lifetime lobbying ban for former members of Congress and 6-year cooling-off periods for congressional staff. Call your House representative and ask them to co-sponsor it. 73% of Americans in polls support a 5-year cooling-off period.
- Use OpenSecrets.org before every election to check how much money every candidate has received from financial services and defense industries. Vote for candidates with the lowest industry donation percentages.
- Follow the Revolving Door Project (revolvingdoorproject.org) — they track every government appointment and flag conflicts of interest in real time. Share their reports when a new cabinet pick is announced.
- Sign the pledge — support candidates who publicly commit to never accepting a lobbying or board position at a company they regulated within 5 years of leaving office.
Part 3 — The IMF Debt Trap
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is an organization of 190 member countries that provides emergency loans to countries in financial crisis. It was created in 1944 as part of the post-WWII economic order (the "Bretton Woods" system), primarily designed by the United States and United Kingdom. The US holds the only single-country veto power in the IMF — a 15% vote share, where major decisions require 85% supermajority approval.
In theory, the IMF is a lender of last resort that stabilizes countries in crisis. In practice, its loans come with "structural adjustment" conditions that have followed the same pattern for 50 years across 80+ countries: cut public spending (health, education, pensions), privatize state-owned assets (water, power, transport), devalue the currency, reduce trade barriers, and raise interest rates. These conditions are required before any loan disbursement.
Crisis hits the country
Currency falls, debt payments become unaffordable, foreign investors withdraw. Often triggered by commodity price drops, interest rate rises in the US (which make dollar-denominated debt more expensive), or political instability.
The IMF offers an emergency loan
The country is given access to dollars to stabilize its currency and make debt payments. The loan is presented as emergency assistance. The conditions are presented as "necessary reforms."
Structural adjustment conditions are attached
Cut the government budget by X%. Sell the state electric company. Remove subsidies on food and fuel. End limits on foreign ownership of banks. These are legal requirements for receiving the loan, not suggestions.
Public services collapse; public assets go on sale
With the government budget cut, hospitals lose funding, schools deteriorate, pensions are reduced. The state water company, power grid, and transit system are privatized — sold at distressed prices because the government needs immediate cash.
International corporations buy the assets cheaply
The same Western banks and corporations that lobbied for IMF conditions are positioned to buy the privatized assets. The country's infrastructure — built by its citizens over decades — transfers to foreign ownership at crisis prices.
The debt remains; the cycle repeats
The country now owes the IMF, owes the foreign corporations that bought its infrastructure (through utility payments), and has a weakened public sector with fewer resources to manage the next crisis. The debt does not go away. When the next crisis hits, the cycle repeats.
Greece (2010–2018): Greece received €289 billion in IMF/EU bailout loans. In return, it implemented the most severe austerity program in a developed democracy since the Great Depression: pensions cut by up to 48%, minimum wage reduced by 22%, 150,000 public sector jobs eliminated, and the state healthcare system defunded. Greek GDP fell by 25% — worse than the US Great Depression. The loans went primarily to pay back German and French banks that had lent recklessly to Greece. The Greek people bore the cost of a crisis caused by their government and foreign lenders.
Ghana (2023): Ghana's 2023 IMF deal — worth $3 billion — required cuts to public wages, a freeze on new civil service hiring, and reduction of subsidies for fuel and food. This during a period of 54% inflation. Ghana's cocoa farmers — who produce 20% of the world's cocoa — were required under the deal's trade liberalization conditions to sell at below-market rates to international commodity firms.
- Support Debt Justice (debtjustice.org.uk) — the UK's leading campaign for cancellation of illegitimate sovereign debt. They track which countries are currently in IMF programs and which debt is legally questionable under international law.
- Demand IMF governance reform — write to your MP or Senator: "The United States should not hold sole veto power in the IMF. Voting shares should reflect population, not 1944 economic power." Major decisions currently require 85% approval, and the US holds 17% — enough to block alone.
- Support the Jubilee Debt model — a proposal (based on the biblical concept of debt forgiveness every 50 years) to cancel debt for countries below $3,000 GDP per capita. First implemented in the 2000s, the Jubilee 2000 campaign cancelled $100 billion in debt for 35 countries.
- Read: "The Shock Doctrine" by Naomi Klein — a documented account of 50 years of IMF structural adjustment programs and their human costs, with case studies from Chile, Argentina, Bolivia, Russia, Iraq, Poland, and South Africa.
- Support moving sovereign debt restructuring from the IMF to a neutral UN body — a proposal backed by 130 countries but blocked by the US and UK in 2024 UN General Assembly negotiations.
Part 4 — The Petrodollar System (and Why It's Breaking)
Since 1974, all oil sold on global markets has been priced in US dollars. This was formalized in a secret agreement between the Nixon administration and Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabia agreed to price its oil exclusively in dollars, and the US agreed to provide military protection for Saudi Arabia and its oil fields. All other oil-exporting countries followed Saudi Arabia's lead.
The consequence: every country on Earth that imports oil — which is nearly every country — must hold reserves of US dollars to buy it. This creates permanent global demand for the dollar, regardless of what the US economy or government does. It allows the US to run budget deficits and borrow cheaply because the rest of the world must hold dollars to function.
In practice, this means the US can fund its military, its tax cuts, and its corporate subsidies by printing dollars — and the cost is borne by every other country that must hold those dollars as reserves, accepting the inflation that comes from US money printing. The petrodollar is a tax on the entire world, payable to the US, that most people have never heard of.
The system is cracking from multiple directions at once:
mBridge: A payment platform created by China, Hong Kong, Thailand, and the UAE that processes international payments without going through SWIFT (the dollar-based messaging system all international banks use). In 2026, mBridge processed over $55 billion in transactions — meaning $55 billion in international trade happened without touching the dollar. Saudi Arabia has begun accepting yuan for some oil sales to China.
Petroyuan: Russia now sells its oil and gas to China and India in Chinese yuan, not dollars. India has purchased Russian oil in yuan and UAE dirhams. In 2023, China and Brazil agreed to settle all bilateral trade in yuan and reais (Brazilian currency) — eliminating the dollar from one of the world's largest trade relationships.
The Strait of Hormuz risk (2026): Iran controls the narrow waterway through which 20% of the world's oil passes. The ongoing Iran-Israel-US tension in 2026 means a scenario where Iran closes the Strait is no longer theoretical. If oil cannot flow, dollar demand for oil payments collapses — potentially triggering a dollar crisis at the same moment the petrodollar alternatives are scaling.
- Hold savings in more than one currency — consider euro or Swiss franc savings accounts, gold-backed instruments, or multi-currency accounts if available in your country. Financial advisors call this "currency diversification."
- Support a Federal Reserve audit — the US Federal Reserve has never been fully audited. Rep. Thomas Massie's "Federal Reserve Transparency Act" proposes a full audit. The Fed's actions directly affect dollar purchasing power worldwide.
- Demand IMF Special Drawing Rights (SDR) reform — the SDR is the IMF's basket of currencies used for international reserves. Currently weighted toward the dollar. A more balanced SDR reduces dollar monopoly on global reserves.
- Read: "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" by John Perkins — a firsthand account of how petrodollar recycling and dollar diplomacy worked in practice, written by a former participant in the system.